It was easy for the Chief Constable to write a letter like this when the information I've made posted on this Blog wasn't available to the general public.
Mr Ryan can argue that the statement made at the King's Lynn Magistrates court "evidence flawed beyond repair" was a remark relating to a single witness. What I find very strange, I would even go as far as to say DISTURBING, Mr Ryan was "satisfied my officers carried out a wide ranging and detailed investigation into complex circumstances leaving no stone unturned". Mr Ryan all I can say is your easily satisfied. Why was it then that the Crown after such a "meticulous inquiry" could only produce one witness namely Gary Sewell, even though 8 other people witnessed the Murder. One of the reasons why I wanted another force to re-investigate this Murder was to see WHY there was inconsistencies in witness evidence.
"no stone unturned"? It's laughable, remember Gary Sewell was interviewed for 80 plus minutes over a 2 day period. I've stated it before but he was NEVER once asked if I was involved. Why was that stone left unturned Mr Ryan ? Another stone left unturned was the implication of Tony Crown by people who witnessed him assault Gorman outside the club, one even said he hit Gorman before I intervened inside the club. He was NEVER questioned about that. Although when he made his witness statement he was asked about a graze on his face, he said he did it "mucking about" with his mates earlier that night. His mates didn't mention it in their statements though. If you've read all the statements I've posted you can come to your own conclusion about "leaving no stone unturned". What a load of bollocks was my conclusion. I would have loved to have seen what conclusion another Police force would have come up with but that was not to be. One more thing, out of the 4 people charged with Tony Gormans Murder only 3 of us were asking for an independent inquiry. Gary Withers was not, draw you own conclusion about that.
No comments:
Post a Comment